Information on Result #908062

Linear OOA(560, 32, F5, 2, 51) (dual of [(32, 2), 4, 52]-NRT-code), using repeating each code word 2 times based on linear OOA(528, 16, F5, 2, 25) (dual of [(16, 2), 4, 26]-NRT-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(560, 32, F5, 2, 50) (dual of [(32, 2), 4, 51]-NRT-code) [i]Strength Reduction for OOAs
2Linear OOA(559, 31, F5, 2, 50) (dual of [(31, 2), 3, 51]-NRT-code) [i]Truncation for OOAs
3Linear OOA(558, 31, F5, 2, 49) (dual of [(31, 2), 4, 50]-NRT-code) [i]
4Linear OOA(555, 29, F5, 2, 46) (dual of [(29, 2), 3, 47]-NRT-code) [i]
5Linear OOA(554, 29, F5, 2, 45) (dual of [(29, 2), 4, 46]-NRT-code) [i]
6Linear OOA(570, 37, F5, 2, 58) (dual of [(37, 2), 4, 59]-NRT-code) [i]Juxtaposition for OOAs
7Linear OOA(572, 38, F5, 2, 60) (dual of [(38, 2), 4, 61]-NRT-code) [i]
8Linear OOA(578, 41, F5, 2, 65) (dual of [(41, 2), 4, 66]-NRT-code) [i]
9Linear OOA(580, 42, F5, 2, 67) (dual of [(42, 2), 4, 68]-NRT-code) [i]
10Linear OOA(582, 43, F5, 2, 68) (dual of [(43, 2), 4, 69]-NRT-code) [i]
11Linear OOA(584, 44, F5, 2, 70) (dual of [(44, 2), 4, 71]-NRT-code) [i]