Information on Result #909249
Linear OOA(3196, 100, F3, 2, 140) (dual of [(100, 2), 4, 141]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(34, 4, F3, 2, 4) (dual of [(4, 2), 4, 5]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;4,3) [i]
- linear OOA(3188, 96, F3, 2, 135) (dual of [(96, 2), 4, 136]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(3188, 97, F3, 2, 135) (dual of [(97, 2), 6, 136]-NRT-code), using
- 30 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(3218, 112, F3, 2, 165) (dual of [(112, 2), 6, 166]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(3218, 112, F3, 2, 167) (dual of [(112, 2), 6, 168]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(3218, 112, F3, 2, 167) (dual of [(112, 2), 6, 168]-NRT-code), using
- 30 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(3218, 112, F3, 2, 165) (dual of [(112, 2), 6, 166]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(3188, 97, F3, 2, 135) (dual of [(97, 2), 6, 136]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.