Information on Result #941514
Linear OOA(2175, 92, F2, 2, 100) (dual of [(92, 2), 9, 101]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(29, 9, F2, 2, 6) (dual of [(9, 2), 9, 7]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (3, 9, 9)-net over F2, using
- linear OOA(2157, 83, F2, 2, 93) (dual of [(83, 2), 9, 94]-NRT-code), using
- 2 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(2159, 84, F2, 2, 95) (dual of [(84, 2), 9, 96]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(825, 28, F8, 23) (dual of [28, 3, 24]-code), using
- Denniston code D(2,8) [i]
- linear OOA(23, 3, F2, 2, 3) (dual of [(3, 2), 3, 4]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;3,2) [i]
- linear OA(825, 28, F8, 23) (dual of [28, 3, 24]-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- 2 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(2159, 84, F2, 2, 95) (dual of [(84, 2), 9, 96]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OOA(2175, 92, F2, 2, 99) (dual of [(92, 2), 9, 100]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
2 | Linear OOA(2175, 92, F2, 2, 98) (dual of [(92, 2), 9, 99]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | Linear OOA(2175, 92, F2, 2, 97) (dual of [(92, 2), 9, 98]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
4 | Linear OOA(2175, 92, F2, 2, 96) (dual of [(92, 2), 9, 97]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
5 | Linear OOA(2175, 46, F2, 4, 100) (dual of [(46, 4), 9, 101]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding |