Information on Result #941602
Linear OOA(2137, 71, F2, 2, 88) (dual of [(71, 2), 5, 89]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(211, 8, F2, 2, 8) (dual of [(8, 2), 5, 9]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(2121, 63, F2, 2, 79) (dual of [(63, 2), 5, 80]-NRT-code), using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on linear OOA(2120, 63, F2, 2, 79) (dual of [(63, 2), 6, 80]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(418, 21, F4, 15) (dual of [21, 3, 16]-code), using
- Simplex code S(3,4) [i]
- linear OOA(24, 3, F2, 2, 4) (dual of [(3, 2), 2, 5]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,2) [i]
- linear OA(418, 21, F4, 15) (dual of [21, 3, 16]-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- 21 times duplication [i] based on linear OOA(2120, 63, F2, 2, 79) (dual of [(63, 2), 6, 80]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OOA(2137, 71, F2, 2, 87) (dual of [(71, 2), 5, 88]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
2 | Linear OOA(2137, 71, F2, 2, 86) (dual of [(71, 2), 5, 87]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | Linear OOA(2137, 71, F2, 2, 85) (dual of [(71, 2), 5, 86]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
4 | Linear OOA(2137, 71, F2, 2, 84) (dual of [(71, 2), 5, 85]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
5 | Linear OOA(2137, 71, F2, 2, 83) (dual of [(71, 2), 5, 84]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
6 | Linear OOA(2137, 71, F2, 2, 82) (dual of [(71, 2), 5, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
7 | Linear OOA(2137, 71, F2, 2, 81) (dual of [(71, 2), 5, 82]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
8 | Linear OOA(2153, 79, F2, 2, 97) (dual of [(79, 2), 5, 98]-NRT-code) | [i] | Juxtaposition for OOAs |