Information on Result #941784
Linear OOA(399, 51, F3, 2, 79) (dual of [(51, 2), 3, 80]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(35, 4, F3, 2, 5) (dual of [(4, 2), 3, 6]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;3,3) [i]
- linear OOA(391, 47, F3, 2, 73) (dual of [(47, 2), 3, 74]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(35, 4, F3, 2, 5) (dual of [(4, 2), 3, 6]-NRT-code) (see above)
- linear OOA(383, 43, F3, 2, 67) (dual of [(43, 2), 3, 68]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(35, 4, F3, 2, 5) (dual of [(4, 2), 3, 6]-NRT-code) (see above)
- linear OOA(375, 39, F3, 2, 61) (dual of [(39, 2), 3, 62]-NRT-code), using
- 1 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(376, 40, F3, 2, 62) (dual of [(40, 2), 4, 63]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(98, 10, F9, 8) (dual of [10, 2, 9]-code or 10-arc in PG(7,9)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,9) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,9) [i]
- linear OOA(36, 4, F3, 2, 6) (dual of [(4, 2), 2, 7]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,3) [i]
- linear OA(98, 10, F9, 8) (dual of [10, 2, 9]-code or 10-arc in PG(7,9)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- 1 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(376, 40, F3, 2, 62) (dual of [(40, 2), 4, 63]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(3113, 58, F3, 2, 90) (dual of [(58, 2), 3, 91]-NRT-code) | [i] | Juxtaposition for OOAs | |