Best Known (25−17, 25, s)-Nets in Base 128
(25−17, 25, 258)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (8, 25, 258)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 8, 129)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- the rational function field F128(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (0, 17, 129)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128 (see above)
- digital (0, 8, 129)-net over F128, using
(25−17, 25, 261)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(8, 25, 261)-net in base 128, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on (8, 32, 261)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (4, 28, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (4, 28, 261)-net over F256, using
(25−17, 25, 276)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (8, 25, 276)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 275)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 276, using
(25−17, 25, 321)-Net in Base 128
(8, 25, 321)-net in base 128, using
- 23 times m-reduction [i] based on (8, 48, 321)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 42, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 42, 321)-net over F256, using
(25−17, 25, 62157)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (8, 25, 62158)-net in base 128, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (8, 24, 62158)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 374 183513 322844 473604 174551 029560 717892 968404 912095 > 12824 [i]