Best Known (29−23, 29, s)-Nets in Base 128
(29−23, 29, 216)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (6, 29, 216)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (5, 29, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
(29−23, 29, 243)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (6, 29, 243)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 242)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 243, using
(29−23, 29, 259)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(6, 29, 259)-net in base 128, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (6, 32, 259)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 28, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 28, 259)-net over F256, using
(29−23, 29, 321)-Net in Base 128
(6, 29, 321)-net in base 128, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (6, 32, 321)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 28, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 28, 321)-net over F256, using
(29−23, 29, 8928)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (6, 29, 8929)-net in base 128, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (6, 28, 8929)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 100516 331787 684789 951654 831829 982170 293893 697683 648691 353056 > 12828 [i]