Best Known (50−29, 50, s)-Nets in Base 128
(50−29, 50, 384)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (21, 50, 384)-net over F128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (21, 51, 384)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 18, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (3, 33, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128 (see above)
- digital (3, 18, 192)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(50−29, 50, 514)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(21, 50, 514)-net in base 128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- (2, 16, 257)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 14, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 14, 257)-net over F256, using
- (5, 34, 257)-net in base 128, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (5, 40, 257)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 35, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 35, 257)-net over F256, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (5, 40, 257)-net in base 128, using
- (2, 16, 257)-net in base 128, using
(50−29, 50, 530)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (21, 50, 530)-net over F128, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(12850, 530, F128, 29) (dual of [530, 480, 30]-code), using
- 138 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 44 times 0, 1, 77 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(12844, 386, F128, 29) (dual of [386, 342, 30]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,356P) [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 386, using
- 138 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 44 times 0, 1, 77 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(12844, 386, F128, 29) (dual of [386, 342, 30]-code), using
(50−29, 50, 1129500)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (21, 50, 1129501)-net in base 128, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (21, 49, 1129501)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 17 918101 846414 177458 786129 303990 607225 935316 814356 393923 151331 845396 381880 908208 662307 778795 022125 844344 > 12849 [i]