Best Known (75−29, 75, s)-Nets in Base 128
(75−29, 75, 1362)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 75, 1362)-net over F128, using
- 1281 times duplication [i] based on digital (45, 74, 1362)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 17, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (28, 57, 1170)-net over F128, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(12857, 1170, F128, 29, 29) (dual of [(1170, 29), 33873, 30]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 14-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(12857, 16381, F128, 29) (dual of [16381, 16324, 30]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(12857, 16384, F128, 29) (dual of [16384, 16327, 30]-code), using
- an extension Ce(28) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16383 = 1282−1, defining interval I = [1,28], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 29 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(12857, 16384, F128, 29) (dual of [16384, 16327, 30]-code), using
- OOA 14-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(12857, 16381, F128, 29) (dual of [16381, 16324, 30]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(12857, 1170, F128, 29, 29) (dual of [(1170, 29), 33873, 30]-NRT-code), using
- digital (3, 17, 192)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(75−29, 75, 4682)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(46, 75, 4682)-net in base 128, using
- 1283 times duplication [i] based on (43, 72, 4682)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (34, 63, 4682)-net over F256, using
- 2562 times duplication [i] based on digital (32, 61, 4682)-net over F256, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25661, 4682, F256, 29, 29) (dual of [(4682, 29), 135717, 30]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 14-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25661, 65549, F256, 29) (dual of [65549, 65488, 30]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25661, 65550, F256, 29) (dual of [65550, 65489, 30]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(28) ⊂ Ce(23) [i] based on
- linear OA(25657, 65536, F256, 29) (dual of [65536, 65479, 30]-code), using an extension Ce(28) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 2562−1, defining interval I = [1,28], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 29 [i]
- linear OA(25647, 65536, F256, 24) (dual of [65536, 65489, 25]-code), using an extension Ce(23) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 2562−1, defining interval I = [1,23], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
- linear OA(2564, 14, F256, 4) (dual of [14, 10, 5]-code or 14-arc in PG(3,256)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2564, 256, F256, 4) (dual of [256, 252, 5]-code or 256-arc in PG(3,256)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(252,256) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2564, 256, F256, 4) (dual of [256, 252, 5]-code or 256-arc in PG(3,256)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(28) ⊂ Ce(23) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25661, 65550, F256, 29) (dual of [65550, 65489, 30]-code), using
- OOA 14-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25661, 65549, F256, 29) (dual of [65549, 65488, 30]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25661, 4682, F256, 29, 29) (dual of [(4682, 29), 135717, 30]-NRT-code), using
- 2562 times duplication [i] based on digital (32, 61, 4682)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (34, 63, 4682)-net over F256, using
(75−29, 75, 39235)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (46, 75, 39235)-net over F128, using
(75−29, 75, large)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 75, large)-net in base 128, because
- 27 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 48, large)-net in base 128, but