Best Known (6, 6+31, s)-Nets in Base 128
(6, 6+31, 216)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (6, 37, 216)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (5, 37, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
(6, 6+31, 243)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (6, 37, 243)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 242)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 243, using
(6, 6+31, 258)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(6, 37, 258)-net in base 128, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (6, 40, 258)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 35, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 35, 258)-net over F256, using
(6, 6+31, 289)-Net in Base 128
(6, 37, 289)-net in base 128, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (6, 40, 289)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 35, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 35, 289)-net over F256, using
(6, 6+31, 5764)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (6, 37, 5765)-net in base 128, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (6, 36, 5765)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 7254 080195 479073 555184 260837 240148 810408 487907 751901 097000 936931 750536 155776 > 12836 [i]