Best Known (8, 8+40, s)-Nets in Base 128
(8, 8+40, 216)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (8, 48, 216)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (5, 48, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
(8, 8+40, 259)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(8, 48, 259)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 42, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
(8, 8+40, 276)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (8, 48, 276)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 275)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 276, using
(8, 8+40, 321)-Net in Base 128
(8, 48, 321)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 42, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
(8, 8+40, 7451)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (8, 48, 7452)-net in base 128, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 140169 382474 648716 389907 050991 371451 653482 546167 318212 750573 258486 974450 730629 087978 412726 246855 293246 > 12848 [i]