Best Known (68−43, 68, s)-Nets in Base 128
(68−43, 68, 342)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (25, 68, 342)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 22, 150)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (3, 46, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (1, 22, 150)-net over F128, using
(68−43, 68, 513)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (25, 68, 513)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 68, 513)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 512)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 512)-sequence over F128, using
(68−43, 68, 361143)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (25, 68, 361144)-net in base 128, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (25, 67, 361144)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 1524 331477 791864 726150 738041 925241 533885 690395 724712 326670 414923 620053 304168 148560 065607 222932 530504 822005 018092 514319 729467 686981 125858 461357 > 12867 [i]