Best Known (8, 8+49, s)-Nets in Base 128
(8, 8+49, 216)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (8, 57, 216)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (5, 57, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
(8, 8+49, 257)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(8, 57, 257)-net in base 128, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on (8, 64, 257)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 56, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 56, 257)-net over F256, using
(8, 8+49, 276)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (8, 57, 276)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 275)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 276, using
(8, 8+49, 6361)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (8, 57, 6362)-net in base 128, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (8, 56, 6362)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 10091 546614 767338 320769 041290 254725 437607 297206 306280 523861 580776 957951 213887 404545 038564 411001 879016 270452 915904 714773 > 12856 [i]