Best Known (62−53, 62, s)-Nets in Base 128
(62−53, 62, 288)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (9, 62, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
(62−53, 62, 289)-Net in Base 128
(9, 62, 289)-net in base 128, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (9, 64, 289)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 56, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 56, 289)-net over F256, using
(62−53, 62, 7287)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (9, 62, 7288)-net in base 128, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (9, 61, 7288)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 347 340634 906118 206885 779504 979914 247260 927964 736668 681252 448010 482084 318469 328866 820111 111721 075122 942583 613277 387562 410777 278940 > 12861 [i]