Best Known (6, 26, s)-Nets in Base 128
(6, 26, 216)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (6, 26, 216)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (5, 26, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
(6, 26, 243)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (6, 26, 243)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 242)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 243, using
(6, 26, 259)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(6, 26, 259)-net in base 128, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (6, 32, 259)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 28, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 28, 259)-net over F256, using
(6, 26, 321)-Net in Base 128
(6, 26, 321)-net in base 128, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (6, 32, 321)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 28, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 28, 321)-net over F256, using
(6, 26, 10733)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (6, 26, 10734)-net in base 128, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 6 133975 926202 828974 782205 210183 846202 395260 690937 612966 > 12826 [i]