Best Known (29, 76, s)-Nets in Base 128
(29, 76, 384)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 76, 384)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 26, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (3, 50, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128 (see above)
- digital (3, 26, 192)-net over F128, using
(29, 76, 577)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (29, 76, 577)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 76, 577)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 576)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 577, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 576)-sequence over F128, using
(29, 76, 552052)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 76, 552053)-net in base 128, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 75, 552053)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 109 837659 175049 169480 546104 743362 513383 539891 074124 305488 065346 713627 998796 008424 837066 305066 713877 664623 107050 339797 942443 062292 471693 267882 702450 509159 537376 > 12875 [i]