Best Known (33, 76, s)-Nets in Base 128
(33, 76, 480)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 76, 480)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 24, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (9, 52, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (3, 24, 192)-net over F128, using
(33, 76, 545)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(33, 76, 545)-net in base 128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- (3, 24, 257)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 21, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 21, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (9, 52, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- (3, 24, 257)-net in base 128, using
(33, 76, 866)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (33, 76, 866)-net over F128, using
(33, 76, 2293172)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 76, 2293173)-net in base 128, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 75, 2293173)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 109 836799 847092 876874 247067 784869 849980 270308 580367 891312 674513 007567 660317 193799 532178 082456 050783 243281 533586 599719 919611 529956 824984 022334 033134 260115 679392 > 12875 [i]