Best Known (27−11, 27, s)-Nets in Base 16
(27−11, 27, 531)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (16, 27, 531)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 5, 17)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 16)-sequence over F16, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 17, using
- the rational function field F16(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 16)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (11, 22, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 11, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 11, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (0, 5, 17)-net over F16, using
(27−11, 27, 653)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (16, 27, 653)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1627, 653, F16, 11) (dual of [653, 626, 12]-code), using
- 10 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 9 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1626, 642, F16, 11) (dual of [642, 616, 12]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25613, 321, F256, 11) (dual of [321, 308, 12]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,309P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25613, 321, F256, 11) (dual of [321, 308, 12]-code), using
- 10 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 9 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1626, 642, F16, 11) (dual of [642, 616, 12]-code), using
(27−11, 27, 317077)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (16, 27, 317078)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (16, 26, 317078)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 20 282504 433454 735554 825872 606851 > 1626 [i]