Best Known (35−11, 35, s)-Nets in Base 16
(35−11, 35, 1045)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 35, 1045)-net over F16, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 3, 17)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 16)-sequence over F16, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 17, using
- the rational function field F16(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 16)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (5, 10, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 5, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 5, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (11, 22, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 11, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 11, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (0, 3, 17)-net over F16, using
(35−11, 35, 5079)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (24, 35, 5079)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1635, 5079, F16, 11) (dual of [5079, 5044, 12]-code), using
- 976 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 14 times 0, 1, 178 times 0, 1, 781 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1631, 4099, F16, 11) (dual of [4099, 4068, 12]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(10) ⊂ Ce(9) [i] based on
- linear OA(1631, 4096, F16, 11) (dual of [4096, 4065, 12]-code), using an extension Ce(10) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 163−1, defining interval I = [1,10], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
- linear OA(1628, 4096, F16, 10) (dual of [4096, 4068, 11]-code), using an extension Ce(9) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 163−1, defining interval I = [1,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 10 [i]
- linear OA(160, 3, F16, 0) (dual of [3, 3, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(160, s, F16, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(10) ⊂ Ce(9) [i] based on
- 976 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 14 times 0, 1, 178 times 0, 1, 781 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1631, 4099, F16, 11) (dual of [4099, 4068, 12]-code), using
(35−11, 35, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 35, large)-net in base 16, because
- 9 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 26, large)-net in base 16, but