Best Known (29−12, 29, s)-Nets in Base 16
(29−12, 29, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (17, 29, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (17, 30, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 15, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 15, 259)-net over F256, using
(29−12, 29, 645)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (17, 29, 645)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1629, 645, F16, 12) (dual of [645, 616, 13]-code), using
- 2 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 0) [i] based on linear OA(1628, 642, F16, 12) (dual of [642, 614, 13]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25614, 321, F256, 12) (dual of [321, 307, 13]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,308P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25614, 321, F256, 12) (dual of [321, 307, 13]-code), using
- 2 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 0) [i] based on linear OA(1628, 642, F16, 12) (dual of [642, 614, 13]-code), using
(29−12, 29, 131836)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (17, 29, 131837)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 83079 953957 685992 918048 174917 007956 > 1629 [i]