Best Known (50−12, 50, s)-Nets in Base 16
(50−12, 50, 21848)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 50, 21848)-net over F16, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(1650, 21848, F16, 12, 12) (dual of [(21848, 12), 262126, 13]-NRT-code), using
- OA 6-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(1650, 131088, F16, 12) (dual of [131088, 131038, 13]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25625, 65544, F256, 12) (dual of [65544, 65519, 13]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(11) ⊂ Ce(8) [i] based on
- linear OA(25623, 65536, F256, 12) (dual of [65536, 65513, 13]-code), using an extension Ce(11) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 2562−1, defining interval I = [1,11], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 12 [i]
- linear OA(25617, 65536, F256, 9) (dual of [65536, 65519, 10]-code), using an extension Ce(8) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 2562−1, defining interval I = [1,8], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 9 [i]
- linear OA(2562, 8, F256, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,256)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2562, 256, F256, 2) (dual of [256, 254, 3]-code or 256-arc in PG(1,256)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(254,256) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2562, 256, F256, 2) (dual of [256, 254, 3]-code or 256-arc in PG(1,256)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(11) ⊂ Ce(8) [i] based on
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25625, 65544, F256, 12) (dual of [65544, 65519, 13]-code), using
- OA 6-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(1650, 131088, F16, 12) (dual of [131088, 131038, 13]-code), using
(50−12, 50, 131088)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (38, 50, 131088)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1650, 131088, F16, 12) (dual of [131088, 131038, 13]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25625, 65544, F256, 12) (dual of [65544, 65519, 13]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(11) ⊂ Ce(8) [i] based on
- linear OA(25623, 65536, F256, 12) (dual of [65536, 65513, 13]-code), using an extension Ce(11) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 2562−1, defining interval I = [1,11], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 12 [i]
- linear OA(25617, 65536, F256, 9) (dual of [65536, 65519, 10]-code), using an extension Ce(8) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 2562−1, defining interval I = [1,8], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 9 [i]
- linear OA(2562, 8, F256, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,256)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2562, 256, F256, 2) (dual of [256, 254, 3]-code or 256-arc in PG(1,256)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(254,256) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2562, 256, F256, 2) (dual of [256, 254, 3]-code or 256-arc in PG(1,256)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(11) ⊂ Ce(8) [i] based on
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25625, 65544, F256, 12) (dual of [65544, 65519, 13]-code), using
(50−12, 50, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 50, large)-net in base 16, because
- 10 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 40, large)-net in base 16, but