Best Known (33−14, 33, s)-Nets in Base 16
(33−14, 33, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (19, 33, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (19, 34, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 17, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 17, 259)-net over F256, using
(33−14, 33, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (19, 33, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (19, 34, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 17, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 17, 321)-net over F256, using
(33−14, 33, 106998)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (19, 33, 106999)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 5444 585239 254909 074962 084855 403811 884896 > 1633 [i]