Best Known (20, 20+14, s)-Nets in Base 16
(20, 20+14, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 34, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 17, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
(20, 20+14, 655)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (20, 34, 655)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1634, 655, F16, 14) (dual of [655, 621, 15]-code), using
- 11 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 10 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1632, 642, F16, 14) (dual of [642, 610, 15]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25616, 321, F256, 14) (dual of [321, 305, 15]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,306P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25616, 321, F256, 14) (dual of [321, 305, 15]-code), using
- 11 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 10 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1632, 642, F16, 14) (dual of [642, 610, 15]-code), using
(20, 20+14, 159001)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 34, 159002)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 87114 945046 055575 095393 630425 874954 925636 > 1634 [i]