Best Known (88−15, 88, s)-Nets in Base 16
(88−15, 88, 2396742)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (73, 88, 2396742)-net over F16, using
- 162 times duplication [i] based on digital (71, 86, 2396742)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 43, 1198371)-net over F256, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25643, 1198371, F256, 15, 15) (dual of [(1198371, 15), 17975522, 16]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25643, 8388598, F256, 15) (dual of [8388598, 8388555, 16]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25643, large, F256, 15) (dual of [large, large−43, 16]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 2563−1, defining interval I = [0,14], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25643, large, F256, 15) (dual of [large, large−43, 16]-code), using
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25643, 8388598, F256, 15) (dual of [8388598, 8388555, 16]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25643, 1198371, F256, 15, 15) (dual of [(1198371, 15), 17975522, 16]-NRT-code), using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 43, 1198371)-net over F256, using
(88−15, 88, large)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (73, 88, large)-net over F16, using
- 163 times duplication [i] based on digital (70, 85, large)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(1685, large, F16, 15) (dual of [large, large−85, 16]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777217 | 1612−1, defining interval I = [0,7], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−7,−6,…,7}|+1 = 16 (BCH-bound) [i]
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(1685, large, F16, 15) (dual of [large, large−85, 16]-code), using
(88−15, 88, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (73, 88, large)-net in base 16, because
- 13 times m-reduction [i] would yield (73, 75, large)-net in base 16, but