Best Known (54−16, 54, s)-Nets in Base 16
(54−16, 54, 1052)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 54, 1052)-net over F16, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 6, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (8, 16, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 8, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 8, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (16, 32, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 16, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 16, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (1, 6, 24)-net over F16, using
(54−16, 54, 9265)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (38, 54, 9265)-net over F16, using
(54−16, 54, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 54, large)-net in base 16, because
- 14 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 40, large)-net in base 16, but