Best Known (20, 20+17, s)-Nets in Base 16
(20, 20+17, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 37, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (20, 38, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 19, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 19, 258)-net over F256, using
(20, 20+17, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (20, 37, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (20, 38, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 19, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 19, 289)-net over F256, using
(20, 20+17, 65782)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 37, 65783)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 36, 65783)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 22 301391 609128 932636 829986 660386 122349 348886 > 1636 [i]