Best Known (22, 22+17, s)-Nets in Base 16
(22, 22+17, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (22, 39, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (22, 40, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 20, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 20, 259)-net over F256, using
(22, 22+17, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (22, 39, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (22, 40, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 20, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 20, 321)-net over F256, using
(22, 22+17, 131569)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (22, 39, 131570)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (22, 38, 131570)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 5709 144717 496493 697660 966285 760651 320809 432026 > 1638 [i]