Best Known (21, 21+18, s)-Nets in Base 16
(21, 21+18, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (21, 39, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (21, 40, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 20, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 20, 258)-net over F256, using
(21, 21+18, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (21, 39, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (21, 40, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 20, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 20, 289)-net over F256, using
(21, 21+18, 45653)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (21, 39, 45654)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 91361 160058 868408 864643 181704 739788 756873 441166 > 1639 [i]