Best Known (92, 92+18, s)-Nets in Base 16
(92, 92+18, 1864134)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 110, 1864134)-net over F16, using
- 166 times duplication [i] based on digital (86, 104, 1864134)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (34, 52, 932067)-net over F256, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25652, 932067, F256, 18, 18) (dual of [(932067, 18), 16777154, 19]-NRT-code), using
- OA 9-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(25652, large, F256, 18) (dual of [large, large−52, 19]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 2563−1, defining interval I = [0,17], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 19 [i]
- OA 9-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(25652, large, F256, 18) (dual of [large, large−52, 19]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25652, 932067, F256, 18, 18) (dual of [(932067, 18), 16777154, 19]-NRT-code), using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (34, 52, 932067)-net over F256, using
(92, 92+18, large)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (92, 110, large)-net over F16, using
- 161 times duplication [i] based on digital (91, 109, large)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 109, large)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(16109, large, F16, 20) (dual of [large, large−109, 21]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 166−1, defining interval I = [0,19], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 21 [i]
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(16109, large, F16, 20) (dual of [large, large−109, 21]-code), using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 109, large)-net over F16, using
(92, 92+18, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 110, large)-net in base 16, because
- 16 times m-reduction [i] would yield (92, 94, large)-net in base 16, but