Best Known (43−19, 43, s)-Nets in Base 16
(43−19, 43, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 43, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (24, 44, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 22, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 22, 259)-net over F256, using
(43−19, 43, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (24, 43, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (24, 44, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 22, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 22, 321)-net over F256, using
(43−19, 43, 115045)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 43, 115046)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 42, 115046)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 374 160802 148838 276075 206288 518567 327690 308786 816436 > 1642 [i]