Best Known (47−19, 47, s)-Nets in Base 16
(47−19, 47, 531)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 47, 531)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 9, 17)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 16)-sequence over F16, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 17, using
- the rational function field F16(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 16)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (19, 38, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 19, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 19, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (0, 9, 17)-net over F16, using
(47−19, 47, 728)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (28, 47, 728)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1647, 728, F16, 19) (dual of [728, 681, 20]-code), using
- 81 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 55 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1642, 642, F16, 19) (dual of [642, 600, 20]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25621, 321, F256, 19) (dual of [321, 300, 20]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,301P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25621, 321, F256, 19) (dual of [321, 300, 20]-code), using
- 81 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 55 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1642, 642, F16, 19) (dual of [642, 600, 20]-code), using
(47−19, 47, 394499)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 47, 394500)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 46, 394500)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 24 520365 657660 137810 116312 313132 372938 707501 595550 529376 > 1646 [i]