Best Known (45−21, 45, s)-Nets in Base 16
(45−21, 45, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 45, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (24, 46, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 23, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 23, 258)-net over F256, using
(45−21, 45, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (24, 45, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (24, 46, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 23, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 23, 289)-net over F256, using
(45−21, 45, 59975)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 45, 59976)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 44, 59976)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 95785 249883 548236 120351 787898 367336 462610 044958 892776 > 1644 [i]