Best Known (12, 12+21, s)-Nets in Base 16
(12, 12+21, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (12, 33, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 33, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(12, 12+21, 80)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(12, 33, 80)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 22, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
(12, 12+21, 88)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (12, 33, 88)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 87)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 88, using
(12, 12+21, 2147)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (12, 33, 2148)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (12, 32, 2148)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 340 344846 253242 154883 087567 111504 976076 > 1632 [i]