Best Known (30, 30+21, s)-Nets in Base 16
(30, 30+21, 522)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 51, 522)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (30, 52, 522)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 26, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 26, 261)-net over F256, using
(30, 30+21, 699)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (30, 51, 699)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1651, 699, F16, 21) (dual of [699, 648, 22]-code), using
- 52 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 0, 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 34 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1646, 642, F16, 21) (dual of [642, 596, 22]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25623, 321, F256, 21) (dual of [321, 298, 22]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,299P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25623, 321, F256, 21) (dual of [321, 298, 22]-code), using
- 52 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 0, 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 34 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1646, 642, F16, 21) (dual of [642, 596, 22]-code), using
(30, 30+21, 316575)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 51, 316576)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 50, 316576)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 606942 398660 718185 953702 757813 870125 226682 706118 404214 510901 > 1650 [i]