Best Known (53−23, 53, s)-Nets in Base 16
(53−23, 53, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 53, 520)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (30, 54, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 27, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 27, 260)-net over F256, using
(53−23, 53, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (30, 53, 642)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (30, 56, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 321)-net over F256, using
(53−23, 53, 161105)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 53, 161106)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 52, 161106)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 411 383624 941798 385749 843792 992451 819473 322625 195208 041917 908616 > 1652 [i]