Best Known (54−23, 54, s)-Nets in Base 16
(54−23, 54, 522)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (31, 54, 522)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 27, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
(54−23, 54, 644)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (31, 54, 644)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(1654, 644, F16, 2, 23) (dual of [(644, 2), 1234, 24]-NRT-code), using
- 2 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(1650, 642, F16, 2, 23) (dual of [(642, 2), 1234, 24]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (27, 50, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 25, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 25, 321)-net over F256, using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (27, 50, 642)-net over F16, using
- 2 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(1650, 642, F16, 2, 23) (dual of [(642, 2), 1234, 24]-NRT-code), using
(54−23, 54, 207290)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (31, 54, 207291)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (31, 53, 207291)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 6582 110554 536487 246190 956088 250621 467538 538688 577627 922385 346016 > 1653 [i]