Best Known (32, 32+23, s)-Nets in Base 16
(32, 32+23, 522)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 55, 522)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (32, 56, 522)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 28, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 28, 261)-net over F256, using
(32, 32+23, 683)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (32, 55, 683)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1655, 683, F16, 23) (dual of [683, 628, 24]-code), using
- 36 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 23 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1650, 642, F16, 23) (dual of [642, 592, 24]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25625, 321, F256, 23) (dual of [321, 296, 24]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,297P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25625, 321, F256, 23) (dual of [321, 296, 24]-code), using
- 36 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 23 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1650, 642, F16, 23) (dual of [642, 592, 24]-code), using
(32, 32+23, 266715)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 55, 266716)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 54, 266716)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 105315 085348 550434 859838 015479 457330 165768 866041 209107 798831 438641 > 1654 [i]