Best Known (59, 59+23, s)-Nets in Base 16
(59, 59+23, 1542)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (59, 82, 1542)-net over F16, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 14, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 7, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 7, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (11, 22, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 11, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 11, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (23, 46, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 23, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 23, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (7, 14, 514)-net over F16, using
(59, 59+23, 18582)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (59, 82, 18582)-net over F16, using
(59, 59+23, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (59, 82, large)-net in base 16, because
- 21 times m-reduction [i] would yield (59, 61, large)-net in base 16, but