Best Known (57−24, 57, s)-Nets in Base 16
(57−24, 57, 522)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 57, 522)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (33, 58, 522)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 29, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 29, 261)-net over F256, using
(57−24, 57, 677)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (33, 57, 677)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1657, 677, F16, 24) (dual of [677, 620, 25]-code), using
- 30 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 19 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1652, 642, F16, 24) (dual of [642, 590, 25]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25626, 321, F256, 24) (dual of [321, 295, 25]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,296P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25626, 321, F256, 24) (dual of [321, 295, 25]-code), using
- 30 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 19 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1652, 642, F16, 24) (dual of [642, 590, 25]-code), using
(57−24, 57, 184852)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 57, 184853)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 431 373828 708903 308954 716534 954604 501171 036133 598769 480301 391583 213266 > 1657 [i]