Best Known (59−24, 59, s)-Nets in Base 16
(59−24, 59, 524)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 59, 524)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (35, 60, 524)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 30, 262)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 261)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 30, 262)-net over F256, using
(59−24, 59, 789)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (35, 59, 789)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1659, 789, F16, 24) (dual of [789, 730, 25]-code), using
- 140 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 19 times 0, 1, 39 times 0, 1, 69 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1652, 642, F16, 24) (dual of [642, 590, 25]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25626, 321, F256, 24) (dual of [321, 295, 25]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,296P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25626, 321, F256, 24) (dual of [321, 295, 25]-code), using
- 140 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 19 times 0, 1, 39 times 0, 1, 69 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1652, 642, F16, 24) (dual of [642, 590, 25]-code), using
(59−24, 59, 293438)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 59, 293439)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 110429 228919 155924 129253 954249 586239 680074 666693 389217 335001 600423 582021 > 1659 [i]