Best Known (31, 31+24, s)-Nets in Base 16
(31, 31+24, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (31, 55, 520)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (31, 56, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 28, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 28, 260)-net over F256, using
(31, 31+24, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (31, 55, 642)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (31, 58, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 29, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 29, 321)-net over F256, using
(31, 31+24, 116447)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (31, 55, 116448)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 685095 392113 094146 060718 077566 564617 324349 945296 444009 716654 926741 > 1655 [i]