Best Known (32, 32+24, s)-Nets in Base 16
(32, 32+24, 522)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 56, 522)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 28, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
(32, 32+24, 644)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (32, 56, 644)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(1656, 644, F16, 2, 24) (dual of [(644, 2), 1232, 25]-NRT-code), using
- 2 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(1652, 642, F16, 2, 24) (dual of [(642, 2), 1232, 25]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (28, 52, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 26, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 26, 321)-net over F256, using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (28, 52, 642)-net over F16, using
- 2 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(1652, 642, F16, 2, 24) (dual of [(642, 2), 1232, 25]-NRT-code), using
(32, 32+24, 146716)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 56, 146717)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 26 961694 130071 742988 741061 933559 703859 426477 690389 533522 190107 963611 > 1656 [i]