Best Known (58−25, 58, s)-Nets in Base 16
(58−25, 58, 522)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 58, 522)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 29, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
(58−25, 58, 644)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (33, 58, 644)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(1658, 644, F16, 2, 25) (dual of [(644, 2), 1230, 26]-NRT-code), using
- 2 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(1654, 642, F16, 2, 25) (dual of [(642, 2), 1230, 26]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (29, 54, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 27, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 27, 321)-net over F256, using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (29, 54, 642)-net over F16, using
- 2 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(1654, 642, F16, 2, 25) (dual of [(642, 2), 1230, 26]-NRT-code), using
(58−25, 58, 184852)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 58, 184853)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 57, 184853)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 431 373828 708903 308954 716534 954604 501171 036133 598769 480301 391583 213266 > 1657 [i]