Best Known (56, 56+25, s)-Nets in Base 16
(56, 56+25, 1034)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (56, 81, 1034)-net over F16, using
- 161 times duplication [i] based on digital (55, 80, 1034)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (14, 26, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 13, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 13, 258)-net over F256, using
- digital (29, 54, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 27, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 27, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (14, 26, 516)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(56, 56+25, 7583)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (56, 81, 7583)-net over F16, using
(56, 56+25, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (56, 81, large)-net in base 16, because
- 23 times m-reduction [i] would yield (56, 58, large)-net in base 16, but