Best Known (60−26, 60, s)-Nets in Base 16
(60−26, 60, 522)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 60, 522)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 30, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
(60−26, 60, 644)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (34, 60, 644)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(1660, 644, F16, 2, 26) (dual of [(644, 2), 1228, 27]-NRT-code), using
- 2 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(1656, 642, F16, 2, 26) (dual of [(642, 2), 1228, 27]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (30, 56, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 321)-net over F256, using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (30, 56, 642)-net over F16, using
- 2 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(1656, 642, F16, 2, 26) (dual of [(642, 2), 1228, 27]-NRT-code), using
(60−26, 60, 136386)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 60, 136387)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 767009 916866 212760 367975 263897 478964 966652 290133 199996 307054 239210 371616 > 1660 [i]