Best Known (33, 33+26, s)-Nets in Base 16
(33, 33+26, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 59, 520)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (33, 60, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 30, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 30, 260)-net over F256, using
(33, 33+26, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (33, 59, 642)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (33, 62, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 31, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 31, 321)-net over F256, using
(33, 33+26, 110189)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 59, 110190)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 110434 874820 073611 653010 901514 262567 017507 822965 669626 440807 675111 758051 > 1659 [i]