Best Known (20, 20+27, s)-Nets in Base 16
(20, 20+27, 89)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 47, 89)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 14, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (6, 33, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (1, 14, 24)-net over F16, using
(20, 20+27, 104)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(20, 47, 104)-net in base 16, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on (20, 55, 104)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 44, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 44, 104)-net over F32, using
(20, 20+27, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (20, 47, 129)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 47, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
(20, 20+27, 6880)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 47, 6881)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 46, 6881)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 24 547432 199854 419891 300721 877131 182316 993140 320081 608096 > 1646 [i]