Best Known (36, 36+28, s)-Nets in Base 16
(36, 36+28, 522)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 64, 522)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 32, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
(36, 36+28, 644)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (36, 64, 644)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(1664, 644, F16, 2, 28) (dual of [(644, 2), 1224, 29]-NRT-code), using
- 2 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(1660, 642, F16, 2, 28) (dual of [(642, 2), 1224, 29]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (32, 60, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 30, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 30, 321)-net over F256, using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (32, 60, 642)-net over F16, using
- 2 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(1660, 642, F16, 2, 28) (dual of [(642, 2), 1224, 29]-NRT-code), using
(36, 36+28, 128792)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 64, 128793)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 115800 866092 967210 610019 568409 028675 044281 893440 682769 105109 925359 923987 865256 > 1664 [i]