Best Known (39, 39+28, s)-Nets in Base 16
(39, 39+28, 524)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (39, 67, 524)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (39, 68, 524)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 34, 262)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 261)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 34, 262)-net over F256, using
(39, 39+28, 733)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (39, 67, 733)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1667, 733, F16, 28) (dual of [733, 666, 29]-code), using
- 84 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 23 times 0, 1, 44 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1660, 642, F16, 28) (dual of [642, 582, 29]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25630, 321, F256, 28) (dual of [321, 291, 29]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,292P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25630, 321, F256, 28) (dual of [321, 291, 29]-code), using
- 84 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 23 times 0, 1, 44 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1660, 642, F16, 28) (dual of [642, 582, 29]-code), using
(39, 39+28, 233306)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (39, 67, 233307)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 474 298506 713321 772417 507434 345176 070565 517484 759428 115981 159776 746030 569094 877396 > 1667 [i]