Best Known (32, 32+29, s)-Nets in Base 16
(32, 32+29, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 61, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (32, 62, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 31, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 31, 258)-net over F256, using
(32, 32+29, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (32, 61, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (32, 62, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 31, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 31, 289)-net over F256, using
(32, 32+29, 58321)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 61, 58322)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 60, 58322)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 767249 432763 301019 246889 376479 185301 940436 047416 322466 495895 192034 324296 > 1660 [i]